Literacy Level of Students in Chemistry Education Department on Thermochemistry

  • Ika Farida Yuliana Universitas Billfath
  • Rendy Priyasmika Universitas Billfath
  • Fatayah Fatayah Universitas Billfath
Keywords: chemistry, chemical literacy, education, thermochemistry

Abstract

This study aims to identify the chemical literacy level of students on Physical Chemistry course, especially in Thermochemisty. Chemical literacy is a major goal in chemistry education recently. The measuring of chemical literacy level in this study used a chemical literacy instrument developed based on Shwartz, et.al framework. The instrument measure students' chemical literacy skills at each level. There are 4 levels of literacy that are measured, namely nominal literacy (level 1), functional literacy (level 2), structural literacy (level 3) and multi-dimensional literacy (level 4). The objects in this study were 14 first year students of Billfath University who took Physical Chemistry course. The data were collected after student got the Thermochemistry subject. The measurement results show that 14.29% of students reach level 3, 71.42% of students reach level 2 and 14.29% of students reach level 1. These results indicate that there is no student that able to reach the highest level 4. Overall, the chemical literacy level of first year students in the Physical Chemistry course is classified as low level. These results allow further development in learning to increase students' chemical literacy level.

References

Cigdemoglu, C. (2020). Flipping the use of science-technology and society issues as triggering students’ motivation and chemical literacy. Science Education International, 31(1), 74–83. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v31.i1.8.

Jarman, R., & McClune, B. (2010). Developing students’ ability to engage critically with science in the news: identifying elements of the ‘media awareness’ dimension. The Curriculum Journal, 21(1), 47–64.

Kemendikbud. (2017). Materi Pendukung Literasi Sains-Gerakan Literasi Sains. In Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. http://gln.kemdikbud.go.id/glnsite/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/cover-materi-pendukung-literasi-sains-gabung.pdf

Mozeika, D., & Bilbokaite, R. (2010). Teaching and learning method for enhancing 15-16 years old studentsknowledge as one of scientific literacy aspect in chemistry: Results based on research and approbation. International Journal of Educational Researchers, 1(3), 1–16.

Muntholib, Ibnu, S., Rahayu, S., Fajaroh, F., Kusairi, S., & Kuswandi, B. (2020). Chemical literacy: Performance of first year chemistry students on chemical kinetics. Indonesian Journal of Chemistry, 20(2), 468–482. https://doi.org/10.22146/ijc.43651.

OECD. (2017). PISA 2015 assessment and analytical framework: Science, reading, Mathematic, financial literacy and collaborative problem solving. Pisa 2015.

OECD. (2019a). Education at a Glance 2019. In Education at a Glance: OECD Indicators. https://doi.org/10.1787/f8d7880d-en.

OECD. (2019b). PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework. In OECD Publishing.

OECD. (2019c). PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): What Students Know and Can Do: Vol. I. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en.

Priyani, Y., Nofiana, M., & Julianto, T. (2019). The effect of contextual teaching and learning (CTL) model towards the student’s science literacy on bio diversity in MAN 2 Banyumas. Jurnal Kiprah, 7(1), 1–12.

Priyasmika, R., & Yuliana, I. F. (2019). Peningkatan hasil belajar mahasiswa Pendidikan Kimia melalui model pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing dengan pendekatan intertekstual pada materi termokimia. Karangan: Jurnal Bidang Kependidikan, Pembelajaran, Dan Pengembangan, 1(02), 146–150.

Rahayu, S. (2017). Mengoptimalkan aspek literasi dalam pembelajaran kimia abad 21. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Kimia UNY, 21, 1–16.

Published
2021-10-30
How to Cite
Yuliana, I. F., Priyasmika, R., & Fatayah, F. (2021). Literacy Level of Students in Chemistry Education Department on Thermochemistry. Proceeding of International Conference on Islamic Education, 87-95. https://doi.org/10.51425/icie.vi.27